The Square Root
of Mass

A fifth dimension hiding inside every particle

Mass behaves like a variance: positive, additive, built from fluctuations. Underneath every variance sits a standard deviation — a linear coordinate. These pages develop the hypothesis that χ = √m is that coordinate: the position of a particle along a fifth dimension, with a geometry, a stability condition, and a dated schedule of experiments that can prove it wrong.

_

SQUS

Winding spectrum

ε ∝ (ℓ − a)²,  a ≈ 0.1726

Three lepton masses, one exact angle

Take the three charged leptons — electron, muon, tau. Take the square root of each mass and read the three numbers as a single point in 3D space. That point lands on a perfect 45° cone around the diagonal — to six decimal places. Physicists call it the Koide relation, and it has resisted explanation for four decades. Drag the scene: the glowing vector is where nature actually put the leptons.

Interactive 3D needs WebGL. The picture it draws: the vector (√me, √mμ, √mτ) lies exactly on a 45° cone around the diagonal (1,1,1) — that is the Koide relation Q = 2/3.

DRAG TO ROTATE

RIGOR Q ≡ (me+mμ+mτ) / (√me+√mμ+√mτ)² = 2/3 holds at Q = 0.6666645 ± 0.0000051 (relative accuracy 3×10⁻⁶). In χ = √m variables this is exact equipartition of |χ⃗|² between the singlet and doublet irreps of the family group S₃; the unique S₃-invariant potential of degree ≤ 4 enforcing it is Veq = λ(n₁ − n₂)². The relation effectively predicted the τ mass in 1981 — 1776.97 MeV against the then-measured 1784.2 ± 3.2 — and later measurements landed on the prediction.

The horn, and three ways to circle it

A coordinate axis for mass raises an alarming question: why doesn't everything slide down to zero mass? The single-scale SQUS geometry closes quadratically near χ = 0, creating an inner centrifugal barrier. The revised analysis shows that this barrier reflects motion but does not by itself make a stable orbit: a completed profile or a separate radial well must fix the absolute mass scale. With that radial closure in place, the three neutrinos can be treated as the first three winding modes, ℓ = 1, 2, 3. Each ring is not a particle circling the horn but a wave with ℓ crests, and what travels around the ring is the wave's phase — the bright marker just rides one crest. Drag the slider and watch their ratios meet the data at a ≈ 0.17.

Interactive 3D needs WebGL. The picture shows a horn-shaped surface with a stabilizing radial completion around the χ = 0 axis. Given that closure, the neutrinos are modeled as winding modes ℓ = 1, 2, 3 with ε ∝ (ℓ − 0.1726)².

DRAG TO ROTATE

ε₂/ε₁ = 4.878 (measured 4.878 ± 0.044) ε₃/ε₁ = 11.677 (measured 11.737 ± 0.182) — MATCHES DATA

RIGOR The canonical warp and single-scale SQUS assumption derive the near-tip law f ∝ ξ² [A/D]. A constant-ξ orbit requires h ≡ d ln f/d ln ξ = 1, and linear stability requires h′ < 0. The pure quadratic horn has h = 2 everywhere, so it supplies a barrier and turning point, not a stable circular orbit; absolute scale needs a radial completion or separate Vrad. In the stated separable winding model, concavity bounds the untwisted ratios by 4 and 9. A U(1) holonomy then gives ε ∝ (ℓ − a)² with a = 0.1726 ± 0.0068, matching 4.878 ± 0.044 and 11.737 ± 0.182 [A/B/D].

Fermion as a torus, boson as a circle

In the SQUS discussion model, one independent phase traces a circle S¹, while two independent phases span a torus T² = S¹ × S¹. The torus is therefore a picture of the fermion's two-phase state, not by itself a derivation of spin. A bosonic channel keeps one phase combination φp,q = pθ₁ + qθ₂, reducing the information to a single circle. Drag the scene or use the control below to follow the 2:1 winding: the minor cycle closes twice while the major cycle closes once, so the full configuration returns only after 4π.

The conceptual diagram compares a two-phase torus T² for a fermionic spinor state with its one-phase bosonic projection S¹. The spinor changes sign after 2π and returns after 4π; the projected channel returns after 2π.

FERMION · T²two phases · spinor orientation
BOSON · S¹ + S¹major and minor cycle projections
θ₁ · LARGE CYCLE
θ₂ · WHITE CROSS-SECTION BESIDE T² · 2:1

DRAG TO ROTATE

fermion: Ψ large projection: B(θ₁) small projection: B(θ₂)

STATUS [A/C] A two-component normalized spinor belongs to S³ ≃ SU(2); fixing component amplitudes leaves a toroidal two-phase slice. Antiperiodicity Ψ(θ + 2π) = −Ψ and Ψ(θ + 4π) = Ψ gives the fermionic 4π cycle, while a bilinear BΓ = Ψ̄ΓΨ removes the sign and is 2π-periodic [A]. The two circles visualize separate projections of the torus's major phase θ₁ and minor cross-sectional phase θ₂, with θ₂ = 2θ₁. At Ω = 2π the small cycle has closed but the large cycle is displaced by π; at Ω = 4π both return to their starting configuration. A physical bosonic channel may instead retain a combination φp,q = pθ₁ + qθ₂. Interpreting this torus as SQUS fermion geometry and the circle as an emergent bosonic correlation channel remains a hypothesis [C], pending a Dirac operator, spin connection, holonomy, and gauge-field derivation.

The Hopf bridge: where exclusion lives, and how bosons escape it

The torus paper's central image. Every colored circle on the left is one Hopf fiber — the full phase circle of a spinor state — and together the fibers over one latitude of the base sphere weave a Clifford torus: the fermion's two-phase home. The Hopf map sends each entire fiber to a single point on the sphere at right, matched by color. Drag the BOSON PROJECTION slider: the fibers collapse to their base points, the torus becomes a single circle of beads, and the phase that carried the 2π sign — with the exclusion principle riding on it — is gone. That is what a boson is here: not a different object, but the same torus with one phase projected away.

Interactive 3D needs WebGL. The picture shows Hopf fibers over one latitude of S² sweeping a Clifford torus (each fiber colored by its base point), and the base sphere on which every fiber collapses to a single point under the Hopf map — the boson channel.

FIBERS · T² ⊂ S³each circle = one Hopf fiber · colored by base point
BASE · S²each fiber → one point · the projected channel

DRAG TO ROTATE

FERMION · T² · two phases (θ₁, θ₂) · exclusion loop present

RIGOR [A/C] A normalized two-component spinor lives on S³; at fixed amplitudes the two remaining phases sweep a Clifford torus T² ⊂ S³ — the fibered tori of the Hopf map h(Ψ) = Ψ†σΨ [A]. The spinor bilinear is the Hopf map itself: it is invariant under the fiber phase Ψ → eΨ, so the 2π sign lives entirely in the fiber that the projection removes. By Sorkin's theorem the exchange loop is homotopic to the 2π-rotation loop, so any Hopf-projected channel carries trivial exchange phase, obeys symmetric statistics, and may condense — because the projection removed the topological obstruction, not because of dimensional counting [A]. A bare axisymmetric torus admits no fermionic quantization; phase decoration (n, k) restores it exactly when nk is odd, making (1, 1) the minimal fermion [A]. Identifying this internal torus with the spatial SQUS loop of the winding tower is the framework's central structural hypothesis [C/D].

Every fermion on one log axis

From the lightest neutrino to the top quark, the masses of the fundamental fermions span about fifteen orders of magnitude — yet they spread with striking evenness on a logarithmic axis, like ticks on a ruler. That log-uniformity is precisely the distribution that cannot tell mass from its square root: the spectrum itself refuses to decide, so dynamics must. Hover over any particle. Open circles are masses these papers predict before experiment weighs them.

RIGOR The measured fermion spectrum is log-uniform — the unique measure invariant under the reparametrization m ↔ χ [C]. Three independent measurements exhibit one and the same scale-invariant fixed-point measure along the mass axis: the log-uniformity of the spectrum, the renormalization-group freezing of the Koide ratio, and the electron's spectral dressing profile, whose plateau equals the QED anomalous dimension exactly. Neutrino values are the B₃ equipartition-cone predictions (m₁, m₂, m₃) = (0.364, 8.662, 50.13) meV, normal ordering, Σm_ν = 59.16 ± 0.24 meV.

The falsification schedule

Speculative frameworks usually fail by being untestable. The revised paper separates direct tests from conditional signatures: each row states a number or consistency condition, together with the measurement or theorem that judges it. Candidate winding levels are explicitly marked conditional until their mixings and population rules are derived. Click a row for a plain-language reading.

OBSERVABLEPREDICTIONEXECUTIONER

RIGOR Table IV of the revised main paper. Direct tests are separated from conditional signatures; formal winding levels are not experimental predictions until their mixing and population rules are derived. Claims are labelled by rigor throughout: [A] theorems and exact computations, [B] computations confronted with data, [C] empirical regularities with uncertainties but no mechanism, [D] hypotheses and outlook.

Read the papers

Everything above is a picture of claims made precisely — with proofs, error bars, and rigor labels — in three papers. All PDFs are hosted here.

JULY 15, 2026 · REVISED MAIN PAPER

The Square Root of Mass as a Fifth Coordinate: Geometry, Stabilization, and Spectral Structure

KRZYSZTOF URBANOWICZ · QWID FOUNDATION

What if mass is not a label but a place — a coordinate along a fifth dimension? Treating χ = √m as that coordinate, the paper shows that the canonical warp derives a quadratic horn near zero mass. The revised analysis proves that this horn is an inner barrier, not a self-sufficient stable orbit, and states the missing radial-stabilization condition explicitly. With radial closure assumed, a holonomy-shifted winding model conditionally reproduces the neutrino spectrum.

  • stable orbit: h(ξ*) = 1 with h′(ξ*) < 0
  • candidate ℓ = 4 level at 166.7 meV, if populated and mixed
  • formal ℓ = 0, −1, −2 level locations remain conditional
  • residual mass drift measures leakage from Vrad

JULY 3, 2026 · COMPANION PAPER

Equipartition Interpretation of the Koide Relation: Representation-Theoretic Formulation, Covariance Test, and Neutrino Mass Predictions

KRZYSZTOF URBANOWICZ · QWID FOUNDATION

A forty-year-old "numerical coincidence" — the Koide relation between the three charged-lepton masses — becomes exact geometry: in √mass coordinates the lepton vector sits at precisely 45° to the diagonal. The paper derives this from a symmetry principle, tests it across every fermion triplet, and extends it to neutrinos, where a unique solution fixes all three masses.

  • Σm_ν = 59.16 ± 0.24 meV (normal ordering)
  • (m₁, m₂, m₃) = (0.364, 8.662, 50.13) meV
  • m_β = 8.85 ± 0.10 meV; m_ββ = 1.25 – 3.97 meV
  • local significance ≈ 4.3σ, robust to look-elsewhere

JULY 18, 2026 · TORUS PAPER

Toroidal Fermions and Hopf-Projected Bosons in the Square-Root-Mass Geometry: Topological Criteria, No-Go Results, and Falsifiers

KRZYSZTOF URBANOWICZ · QWID FOUNDATION

Can a torus be a fermion? Not a bare one: its rotation loop is contractible, so no fermionic quantization exists. Decorated with phase windings (n, k), it acquires exactly the right topology when nk is odd — and the boson channel is not a metaphor but the Hopf projection itself, which removes the one phase carrying the 2π sign, and with it the exclusion principle. The paper welds this established topology to the mass axis, proves internal no-go theorems, and publishes its falsifiers.

  • fermionic torus ⇔ nk odd; minimal fermion (n, k) = (1, 1)
  • a = Φ − ½ with flux Φ = 0.6726(68), compatible with 2/3 at 0.9σ
  • self-dual scale m* ≤ 3.8 meV; ceiling m_max = m*²/m_L ≈ 10¹⁷ GeV
  • universal vacuum flux cap P_max ≈ 3.2×10⁻¹¹ W